|
The Times they are a-changing
June 2006
Today, the industry is trying to grapple with the potential
impacts of ebooks. Everyone is once again jockeying for position,
but who will prevail? What are the issues that may not be fully
understood and openly discussed? Putting to one side the impact on
today’s supply chain, are we now seeing a far more significant
potential realignment of the publishing value chain? There are only
two players that are essential to the value chain – the author (or
creator) and the consumer (or reader). Everyone else exists only if
they add or are perceived to add value. The troubadours who read
aloud, or the scribes who wrote the manuscripts where effectively
removed by the invention of the press. Tomorrow, who will add value
and how?
Some ten years ago the publishing industry was caught in what
could be best described as a CDRom “feeding frenzy”. Many publishers
were convinced that the technology would present a significant
revenue opportunity, that the investment was a “must do” and that
the alternative internet superhighway, was and would remain, little
more than a dirt track. Understandably, few today would talk about
the CDRom with the same passion and belief. On reflection, it was a
time when many publishers got their fingers burnt and an experience
that made many cautious of the digital future.
Since then we have seen ............... the Dotcom boom, bust and
recent re-emergence, the impact of P2P services such as Napster and
Kazaa on the music industry, the phenomenal take up of broadband
services (and rise in both bandwidth and quality), the terminal
decline of transient media formats such as VHS, cassettes and CDRom,
the IPod “must have” fashion accessory and podcasts, blogs in their
many forms, the adoption of “clicks and mortar” by high street
retailers, the deployment and take-up of wi-fi connectivity, the
morphing of mobile, MPEG, PDA and PC technologies, the emergence of
VOIP “free” telephony, digital broadcasting, and much more. We are
now truly living in a digital age.
However, ten years on, is what we read and how we read it any
different? Has the world of the book changed?
In the journal, academic, reference and professional sectors many
would answer “yes”. Here the ability to search, discover, qualify
and access nuggets of information was always of high value.
Therefore, as it became easier to do it online, so the “tipping
point” was arrived at - where it becomes adopted by all - and the
standard way was reached.
But fiction is different. We start on page one and read the story
through to the end. There is little value to be gained from reading
page ninety nine in isolation, or searching for every reference to a
word or phrase.
HarperCollins have announced that they will have 10,000 ebook
titles available this summer. Nigel Newton, on the recent launch of
their Bloomsbury ebook store, speculated that 50% of fiction will be
digital by 2016. Irrespective of what we think of the accuracy of
this prediction, which is more alarming, the percentage or the date?
It is sobering to think that if only 25% of fiction were to migrate
in the next ten years, then the impact in the trade would be greater
than that of Amazon over the last ten.
Digital content is clearly once again attracting the booktrade’s
attention. Today the “noise” is about selling and downloading
digital content or ebooks. It is easy to envisage digital audio
books being only available as downloads to PCs, MP3 players and
mobiles. One of the last pieces of this mobile jigsaw will happen
when the large car retail companies improve their in-car
specifications and make MP3 and GPS technology a standard within all
cars. It is also relatively easy to envisage all pre-1920 literature
becoming truly “public domain” and freely available in digital
format as never before. Mobibook.com sells 1000 classics
downloadable for $23.99 (including VAT).
But do we believe that things are radically changing with the
book itself?
The “killer” ebook reader that we all so eagerly awaited
continues to be much talked about. Today we see the technology being
presented on the TV News. Philips, Sony, Xerox, IBM and many others
believe they have the answers and it is merely refinement, packaging
and marketing. However, is the ideal ebook reader the key, or are
there other issues that are more compelling to the consumer? It is
often the case, as with the much cited Betamax versus VHS technology
battle, that due to other issues, the inferior technology prevails.
As the industry continues to grapple with the inefficiencies of
its physical supply chain we now have the emergence of a virtual
one. Do we honestly believe that the same value chain that underpins
all from the author to the reader will remain as it is today? Once
we remove the physical product do we then also remove the existing
physical store? Does the consumer expect the selling of the digital
download to be the same experience as the physical book? The
internet will be integral to ebook sales' and delivery.
Content or Context?
We find Amazon now joined by what may appear to many as an
unlikely book loving group; Google, Yahoo and Microsoft. They all
have different book market approaches and all are there for
different reasons, but inherently these companies want as much
digital content as they can get, for as little as they need to pay,
or ideally for free and they will all make money from it
differently.
Google wants to index and organise the world’s information and
make it universally accessible and useful. Perfectly laudable, and
if through their Google Book Search initiative consumers find what
they want, then they will be connected to a number of choices. But
Google's perceived “scan first and consider copyright issues after”
approach has rightly worried many and any serious book buyer would
be far from impressed by their initial search service.
What has to be remembered is that Google is not just a search
engine but more of an advertising placement agency. It makes money
out of connecting buyers to sellers and if sellers want clear
visibility it is available, albeit at a price.
So working on the premise that advertising revenue pays their
wages, how will it work within the book-trade? Who will “pay to be
seen” and sell the download? How will the many potential rights
issues be resolved?
Yahoo and Microsoft have similar desires. Yahoo has launched its
own Open Content Alliance, a consortium which, in conjunction with
Hewlett Packard, the UK's National Archive, and the university
libraries in California and Toronto, aims to digitise 18,000 classic
works of American literature and develop this to include a wide
range of historical fiction, children's books through to specialised
technical papers. Microsoft and The British Library formed a
strategic alliance in 2005. Their aim was to digitise 100,000
out-of-copyright books, make them searchable via MSN Book Search and
also available over the Internet.
Amazon thought that it had stolen the high ground with its
“search inside” programme. However, it may be overtaken by others
who have a stronger internet brand.
The search engines are all potentially raising the bibliographic
bar to a new height, where digital content itself is used to support
the search and the qualification. Irrespective of the many questions
about rights, how is the trade going to respond to the demands for
more and more contextual information? As the definition of digital
content and context blurs, who will provide the information? We have
already seen that these new entrants are capable of making their
own. It is sobering to remember that not so long ago the digital
jacket images we now expect as standard were scarce and the only
access to rich and accurate bibliographic information was through an
agency.
Publishers who create digital impressions of their titles and who
also have rich bibliographic information and the ability to export
it digitally are well positioned. They can provide as little or as
much as they believe is appropriate to whomever is capable of taking
it and in doing so ensure that any representation is via their
content and consent. Other than the potential richness of the
information, this is no different to today. However, we know that
many struggle to meet today’s - or even yesterday’s - demands. It is
therefore important that someone steps up to this service
opportunity and that the vision is not restricted to pure context
and is affordable to all.
The capacity of the DVD has created an opportunity for film
producers to add many unique extras such as outtakes, director’s
comments, screen tests, trailers etc. Does the ebook become
significantly different to the physical book, or are we merely
replacing the jacket?
Whose sale is it anyway?
Once we have the capability to satisfy the emerging search and
qualification demands, we need to sell the book. It is highly
unlikely to expect download buyers to make their purchase any other
way than over the web. They may also want to buy a physical book or
have the choice of both. Amazon is well positioned to meet these
demands and has recently announced its “Amazon Upgrade” service,
whereby individual consumers will be able to 'upgrade' their
purchase of a physical book on Amazon.com to include complete
on-line access.
In the last ten years Amazon has created a global online consumer
book brand built on range, service and convenience. It has killed
off many pretenders and, together with the likes of ABE, redefined
the market blurring old and new, used and mint. It has developed
affiliate programmes to service many authors, publishers and
retailers. It is now truly multimedia and there is little to doubt
its ability to service books in whatever form.
There are many collaborative industry ventures such as the German
Borsenverein's “Volltextsuche” project, the Swedish “Elib AB”
initiative, the French “Cyberlibris” and ”Cairn” projects and the EU
Library initiative. Many academic publishers such as Thomson, Wiley,
McGraw Hill, Taylor and Francis, CUP etc have initiated digital
sales and marketing strategies. Players such as DPS (Digital
Publishing Solutions) not only create digital typeset content and
convert it to the various digital formats, but also host publisher
web ebookstores for their clients. Macmillan have recently launched
their “Bookstore” project aimed at delivering various digital
formats via multiple channels.
Research such as that by CACI and YouGov suggests, “as many
retailers are finding it increasingly difficult to achieve like for
like growth on the High Street, double digit growth is becoming the
norm for internet retailers”. This was referring to sales of the
same physical product , but in publishing we are potentially also
changing the product and with the exception of kiosks, it will be
only available through one channel.
Search and discovery is no longer necessarily tied to fulfilment.
Indeed once readers have found their title linking to a different
site to buy and download, it is natural and should be a “click
away”. But who owns the consumer? Who is able to leverage the
relationship?
We are clearly moving from mass to the market of one. Direct
marketing is enabled via the web, but who is geared to manage this
today? The book clubs who were best positioned at the start clearly
lost ground on the internet. Many publishers have outsourced this
function to specialist mailing houses. If publishers are serious
about new channels and direct marketing, do they have the skills and
capability effectively to respond?
Pricing
Will the ebook digital download be cheaper, the same, or more
expensive? Early adopters appear to have taken different routes.
What impact will it have on the VAT and taxation of the physical
book? The sunk cost of digital production is minuscule compared to
the production, inventory and distribution costs. In the world of
the internet the user is very cost sensitive. Dan Brown is widely
available to download for $6.99 list.
Another further point is that the ebook has to compete alongside
other digital media which has learnt the hard way what the market
will and won’t tolerate. An interesting side effect in the music
world is the impact its transition has had on lowering physical
prices.
Authors
What will it mean to the publisher / author relationship? Will
the recent music experience of “finding” the likes of The Artic
Monkeys be repeated in discovering new authors? As publishers cut
back on their physical titles should they consider expanding their
virtual one and using the ebook as their test bed?
There are many questions on contracts, permissions, subsidiary
rights and royalties.
How will rights and royalties evolve in the digital world? For
example, could authors find themselves “locked into” the virtual
state of being “never out of print” and their rights never revert?
How, and by whom, will the royalty % due be calculated?
The Value Chain
As demonstrated by many, the ability to grow quickly and respond
to change is important in the virtual world. It is wrong to assume
that there will always be a place for everyone at tomorrow’s table.
This does not mean that they become redundant, but it means that
they must change, adapt and recognise where they can add value.
In conclusion, the times are certainly changing and the impact of
digital content is potentially as great as the impact of the
invention of the printing press itself.
Martyn Daniels
Bibliophile Booksellers and Opus 57
SOCIETY OPPOSES MORE CARS ON ROYAL CRESCENT

Kindly reproduced with kind permissions of
www.thisisbath.com (The Bath Chronicle)
BY EMMA COONEY
11:00 - 20 September 2005
Residents of Bath's best- known address claim it
is in danger of being turned into a car park.
They fear the number of spaces in front of the
Royal Crescent will double and say the imposing
Georgian street should be protected from too
much traffic.
Council officials have proposed increasing
the number of spaces in response to demands for
more parking facilities.
But campaigners say it would be nonsensical
at a time when work to restore the street and
features, such as the ha-ha wall, to their
former glory is under way.
At yesterday's launch of the new website
www.royalcrescentbath.com, which is dedicated to
the famous landmark, residents told of their
parking fears.
Website editor Martyn Daniels said: "We had
an 18-year battle to ban open top buses and do
not want the crescent turned into a car park
now.
"The work we are doing to repair railings and
the pavement, and look after the ha-ha, is a
nonsense in light of allowing more cars."
He said more parking would mean more traffic
as people searched for a space, and more damage
to the historic street.
The society has written a letter of objection
to Bath and North East Somerset Council after a
poll of its members showed three to one
opposition to the plans.
B &NES' executive member for transport and
highways, Cllr Sir Elgar Jenkins, who was at the
launch, confirmed parking spaces would double if
the plans went ahead, and said the request had
come from some of the residents themselves.
"Residents have asked for more parking and
the council is suggesting ways they could have
it."
At the moment, one side of the street is for
residents and other central zone permit holders,
with a few pay-and-display spaces. Most of the
other side has a single yellow line, which bans
cars parking there from 8am-6pm Monday to
Saturday. This would become a mix of pay and
display and residents' spaces.
A decision is expected to be made next month.
The Royal Crescent Society's project with the
council's parks department and the National
Heritage Lottery Fund to restore the railings
and ha-ha - the wall dividing the grassy area
reserved for residents from the main green - to
their former glory was also celebrated.
Work is due to start early next year at a
cost of £120,000, of which £30,000 was raised by
crescent residents.
To create www.royalcrescentbath.com, the
society looked back at more than 200 years of
history and opened up its archive of 30 years of
printed newsletters, which cover its history and
achievements.
The Bath Preservation Trust, which has its
office above the museum at No 1, and which has a
long and strong association with the society,
has helped by granting access to its archives
and materials.
Included on the website is the 1945 Plan For
Bath, which proposed moving council offices to
the crescent and building an extended civic
centre behind it, and an 1850 plan to turn the
lawn into a mini-Versailles complete with two
water fountains.
The crescent was described by historian
Walter Ison as "the greatest single achievement
in the field of urban architecture."
e.cooney@bathchron.co.uk
Who is the
weakest Link?
Publishing News, 25th April, 2003
Martyn Daniels takes a robust view of
developments - or lack of them - since KPMG's
ground-breaking review of the book industry
supply chain
It is now five years since KPMG delivered
its review of the UK Supply Chain. Many
changes have happened during those years and
many of their recommendations have been
pursued by the industry. We have seen an
increase in electronic transactions, the
improvement in price and availability
information through the successful BIC Tick
accreditation programme, the emergence of new
Internet services such as PubEasy and
batch.co.uk, the returns initiative and the
development of new standards such as ONIX. The
effort has certainly been expended both by the
admiral work by bodies such as BIC and the
considerable time and effort invested by major
players.
However, some feel that the goals of the
review have failed to live up to their full
expectations and the failure of others to
implement the recommendations has cast doubt
on its relevence to their working lives. Is it
surprising that many smaller players today
hold this view and that the supply chain
euphoria of yesterday seems to have waned?
Within supply chains, things often only
happen when inspired and dogged individuals
make them - or someone waves a big stick. The
US adoption of ONIX is clearly gathering pace
and is , for example, being driven by the
likes of Amazon and Barnes and Noble. But who
is the UK's supply chain champion?
As we all know a very small number of
titles make the vast majority of income and of
sales volume, but as we move closer to every
Christmas we see the huge bets placed on what
the music industry coverts as "The Christmas
No. 1". Blockbusters are fired out of the
publisher's gattling guns into the market.
Some succeed, but many more fail. We are awash
with stock which will inevitably be seen, for
a fraction of the price, in an adjacent bargin
store. Also we see those copies that had to be
stocked to promote the title, to fill the
shelf and that will probably sell - albeit
over time.
Mass Production?
We often talk about the number of new
titles published each year, the number of
titles still in print and on the increasing
backlist, but is this a problem by itself or
are the number of units produced the reat
issue? It would be interesting to compare the
number of titles published, units produced and
the number of units sold, i.e. the number of
units shipped to merely wallpaper the latest
megastore versus the number of units actually
sold and their turn rate achieved. One major
trade house that i spoke too had consciously
reduced the number of new titles, but when
asked was still producing about the same
number of units across the reduced number of
titles.
Irrespective, there are too many units
clogging up the arteries of the supply chain
and which are all too often going nowhere. We
have to ask ourselves why?
Imagine placing an order expecting to
recieve one discount and finding on receipt
you had the wrong price and were given the
wrong discount. Some will say it seldom
happens today and is not an issue. Although
the exchange of price and availability
information has significantly helped reduce
the issue over recent years, the majority of
customer service queries are still over price
and availability.
Back to basics
Uncertainty is the mother of waste. It will
invariably end up feeding poor decisions. What
percentage of today's invoices are in query?
Which of these are genuine and how many result
in protracted queries and delays while raising
credit notes? The answer will fluctuate widely
but given Julian Rivers' comment that Bertrams
recieved 80,000 books over three months that
they didn't order and that they had an issue
with 600 academic books that were priced 300%
greater than the publisher's file price, it's
safe to say, no one is immune. One major
distributor soken to quoted 60% of invoice
queries raised were with respect to quantity,
30% price and discount and 10% quality
control. Another talked about the issue of
validating special discounts given by
representatives of third party publishers and
the protracted chain of communication to
reslove them. They also intimated that 5% of
invoices generated queries. Some would argue
that the cost to the industry is around 50
pence for every credit note. Others would say
considerably more when they look at the phone
calls, postage and time incurred by both
parties.
The reality check
One major distributor stated that a
significant number of clients were routinely
requesting copy invoices. Some suppliers and
services such as batch.co.uk are making copy
ivoices available by automated request and
download over the internet. But is this
treating the symptom or the cause? Why is the
volume of copy invoices raised so high?
Merely posting any transaction to a trading
partner electronically just means that it gets
there quicker. As demonstrated in many other
industry sectors, the real opportunity to
reduce cost and waste requires an effective,
"open" exchange and sharing of information
between trading partners. This is possible
between larger players but becomes harder to
achieve with smaller organisations who often
can't justify the investment.
Supply Chain Management is achievable
within the large player to large player
environment. However, in this environment, it
is often easy to gain consensus to a vision
and then retreat to work on individual
projects and agendas. What this often delivers
is fustration, apathy and poor return on
investment for all. The role of BIC can be
critical to achieving co-operation as with the
returns initative or stimulating activity as
with the BIC Tick programme.
It is good to see a number of the larger
companies are now starting to jointly plan
their projects and co-ordinate their
activities in greater detail, based on the
common standards and processes agreed within
the industry. This is not just about sharing
cost but recognising their collective ability
to maximise benefit. Unfortunately the
co-operation is often not across the chain but
usually at one end of it.
Eighty per cent of the supply chain
generates 20% of the value; however, it incurs
a disproportionate cost to service. Here we
need to find one cheap and effective key that
unlocks the door to mass adoption. Small
publishers need to be ONIX enabled. Small
retailers and other small traders such as
schools need an effective end to end
transaction service from ordering through
error handling and payment reconciliation to
payment. Some may say it exists today, others
that there is a patchwork quilt of potential
solutions fromdifferent suppliers. There is
little benefit of having five different ways
and services to find a book, three more to
order it, two that process the errors and
three ways to pay for it. Each duplicate
service, each broken link incurs cost to all.
At the tailend, can the supply chain afford
more than one service and can the supply chain
afford an inefficient tail end?
Copyright© all rights reserved Publishing
News Limited 2003
Daniels
sets up consultancy
The Bookseller, 15th Febuary,2002
MARTYN DANIELS, Vista strategic director,
is to leave the US-based publishing systems
provider to set up his own consultancy
company.
Mr. Daniels said the new operation, Opus
57, would offer, "independant strategic advice
on IT and customer relations management,
supply chain issues and bibliographic data
management". It will not provide business
solutions, but offer "a range of services that
can help deliver the right solution".
Mr Daniels, who has worked at Vista for six
years on projects such as PubEasy and
Batch.co.uk, will continue to work with the
company in an advisory role.
"I will offer strategic advice to Vista,
but essenttially I want to work with
everybody," he said. " Idon't want to get too
close to one company as that would impede my
independence. There are few consultants who
have my publishing systems experience."
A Vista spokesperson said: "We have a great
relationship."
More information can be had at
www.opus57.co.uk
© 2002 Bookseller Publications
VNU Entertaiment Media Uk Ltd,
E-services in focus as Daniels leaves Vista
Publishing news, 15th Febuary,2002
MARTYN DANIELS, WHO has played a key role
at Vista in the development of e-services for
the book trade, including PubEasy and Batch,
has left the company to set up his own
consultancy practice.
For the past six years Daniels has been the
firm’s Strategic Development Director, a role
that has put him at the sharp end of the drive
to achieve greater efficiencies through new
technology for such vital functions as
ordering and payment services.
The parting appears to have been an amicable
one, and Daniels will continue to work for
Vista in a consultancy role through his new
company, Opus 57. The BA’s Chief Executive Tim
Godfray, was among those to recognize Daniels’
contribution: “Martyn has been immensely
supportive to Batch from the earliest days,”
he said.
However his departure comes at a time when a
number of the major players in the e-commerce
field are jostling for position in what has
become a highly competitive market where
innovative products require heavy investment.
PubEasy is owned by Vista but relies in part
on bibliographic data from Whitaker, with whom
it continues to have a service agreement. Such
is the labyrinthine nature of the trade’s
information technology systems, however, that
Whitaker has itself recently launched Whitaker
Web, an ordering service which the company
says is targeted at the small bookseller. In
that respect it may be aiming at a somewhat
different market: PubEasy captures information
from the major distributors, allowing
booksellers to check availability, dues and
accounts as well as ordering, but there is
bound to be a competitive element between the
two. Nevertheless Paul Pounsford, MD, Whitaker
Information Services, told PN this week:
“Although we have our own Whitaker Web product
now, there is no reason why we should not
continue to supply our data to PubEasy.com,
which we will do.”
The three major wholesalers of course operate
their own ordering systems, adding to the
electronic array, but here as elsewhere the
competition has undoubtedly worked to the
advantage of the users. Meanwhile Book Data,
another major player, is reporting good
progress from its web-based Ist Exchange. This
service, developed following Book Data’s
buy-out of the Vista share of First Edition
last year, enables large book purchasers to
communicate with smaller publishers, and which
has the advantage of offering a low entry
level.
The company has also announced an integrated
selection, cataloguing and web-based ordering
service for the library market, and is set to
extend this to the general UK and
international trade, adding further to the
range of bookseller choice and — of course —
to the competition.
Undoubtedly web-based developments have the
possibility of offering a more attractive
solution to many services. Batch, which allows
booksellers to pay their suppliers
electronically through the Internet, is a
prime example, and has drawn support from
major publishers and distributors such as
Macmillan, HarperCollins, OUP and THE, with
STL, TBS and John Wiley about to join.
Booksellers using batch. co.uk need go online
only when they want to make payments. Book
ordering and stock availability systems
ideally require the user to be online
throughout the working day; the currently high
costs of online access through BT is probably
the major reason why trade take-up of
web-based systems has not been as rapid as
their operators might have hoped, but these
costs are coming down, and will no doubt reach
a level that will enable a bookseller to
accommodate the cost of staying online during
working hours.
Copyright© all rights reserved Publishing
News Limited 2002
CRM: Profiting from Today's Customers
UKSG Serials Journal,
November 2001
CRM is a fundamental cornerstone of any
business strategy and is cross-functional in
its impact. Technology by itself is only an
enabler. CRM is not an IT project, but a
business strategy that affects business
processes and culture.
CRM has the potential to increase revenues
by enabling a business to better understand
its customers and then use this information to
serve them better. It can identify which
customers and customer groups are the most
fruitful targets and seek to increase the
value and frequency of purchases among the
most profitable of their customer groups.
Effective CRM implementation should also
decrease the investment in marketing to and
servicing unprofitable types of customers.
However, increasing revenue, if it brings
with it a disproportionate increase in cost,
does not deliver increased profit.
Who is the Customer?
The identity of the reader is not often
known to anyone in the supply chain. When it
is known, this information is rarely shared.
Some publishers believe that directly
servicing the needs of the ultimate customer,
the reader, is both a desirable and achievable
objective.
The role of intermediaries has obscured
publishers’ understanding of their library
customers. The identity of the institution
subscribing to journals may be known but the
presence of Subscription Agents has made it
extremely difficult to distinguish real
subscription churn from the background noise
generated by libraries simply switching
agents.
The academic book and journal buyer is
typically institutional rather than individual
– and the holder of the budget is often only
tangentially involved in the purchasing
decision. The target of promotional activity
is the individual end user, although end user
behavior has been little understood by either
publisher or library. This complicates the
measurement of direct marketing effectiveness.
One major academic publisher stated,
"Targeting down the channel with a view to
applying direct pressure back up the channel
does not always work within an institutional
environment."
Authors are not just Authors
One problem with using the acronym “CRM” in
this paper is that the term "Customer" is
wrong. It is confusing to partners in the
supply chain, it is confusing to the ultimate
customer, the researcher or undergraduate. In
serial publishing it is also confusing to the
author, who is also the publisher's customer.
“Contact” Relationship Management would be
more appropriate.
The author relationship is perhaps the key
customer relationship for many publishers. One
major academic publisher said that they are
trying to build a "club " where authors can
access pertinent information and build a
stronger relationship with their publisher.
This publisher believes that authors can
reasonably "expect to be recognized and
receive service."
Another major academic publisher reported
that they recognize the author relationship as
spanning the entire publishing lifecycle:
"They are authors, but also can be reviewers,
sit on editorial boards, could be on a library
committee, be buyers and ultimately are our
readers. However we only see them as authors."
It is clear that an important aspect of any
effective CRM solution for publishers should
be to recognize that customers will be
different things at different times and at
different points in the publishing lifecycle.
Do we really know our customers?
Information we receive is usually about
historic performance. It does not tell us with
any certainty how a customer will react to any
future initiative. It often can tell us little
about the customer’s price elasticity,
propensity to be cross sold, or responsiveness
to marketing campaigns.
Customer profitability and sales history
does not by itself give much indication of the
future behavior of a customer.
If the information that is held about a
“customer” relates entirely to financial
transactions, then that will provide the
entire depiction of the relationship. The
business misses all the other interactions
that make that relationship what it is and
enable it to be fully leveraged.
Everything can be tracked. The question is
what data creates knowledge and what is
"noise."
Marketing Amnesia
From the customer’s viewpoint, separate
customer databases can result in a service
that appears to have forgotten who they are,
what business they have done, when they last
contacted us, the nature of our commercial
relationship, the names of our contacts.
This condition might be called "Marketing
Amnesia"; when seen from a customer
perspective, such a condition will ultimately
prove fatal to any organization.
Customers will not behave the same
online
As the customer migrates online their
behavior will change. The product and
navigation will not be limited by the
constraints of the physical product. This is
perhaps most obvious for the academic, who may
be simultaneously a researcher, teacher and
student; their patterns of behavior may prove
incomprehensible if there is a failure to
grasp this simple fact.
When the customer goes online, their
behavior will change and they will want this
to be recognized.
Communicating with the customer
As with other sectors, academic book
publishers are concerned about upsetting
existing supply chain relationships and
therefore are careful to offer traditional
retailers (often with their own high quality
differentiated customer lists) cooperative
marketing opportunities. This has not, though,
stopped online retailers becoming extremely
significant suppliers in the academic market.
Journal publishers have been much less careful
about their relationship with subscription
agents (whose “marketing” impact they have
always considered to be insignificant). As
journals have moved increasingly to online
delivery, and as online “deals” have become
more individualized, journal publishers have
been employing active sales forces for the
first time in decades.
Academic and information publishing content
is quickly migrating online and the user has
long been connected, making the human
interaction harder to control and maintain. As
a result, email-marketing and Telesales are
now quickly becoming the channels of
preference.
One information publisher, heavily reliant
on cross selling to their customers every time
they call, told us they now find a significant
number of customers buying over the Web,
direct. They have "lost" the relationship as
the customer now logs on, buys and logs off.
This publisher is now looking at technology
that can interpret behavior while the customer
is logged on and generate an interactive "Web
chat" communication with a Customer Services
rep online, reestablishing the personal
relationship and the opportunity for cross
selling.
As more business migrates to the Web,
managing the relationship may become more cost
effective but there is a danger that personal
contact could be lost and with it considerable
customer value.
Permission Marketing
A major UK STM publisher told us that they
were using email to distribute tables of
contents. Another publisher, recognizing the
importance of email communication, reported
that they were currently investigating
Artificial Intelligence technology to analyze
and manage email alerts, based on a customer’s
previous activities and known purchasing
patterns.
However, capturing, validating and
maintaining email addresses is not easy.
People have different addresses and their
structure can defy all logic. Permission
marketing at a basic level provides either
"opt-in " or "opt-out" choices, but it can be
less binary: the customer can be given various
options on the basis of their individual
interests, which in turn provides more
information about them, allowing better
targeting of marketing information.
The academic environment provides a number
of lessons about identification of users and
privacy that may be equally significant in
other sectors as online offerings mature.
Users are unwilling to take on the burden of
authentication through multiple password
systems, and may prefer the anonymity of
IP-address identification (even at the expense
of some convenience). In corporate use, such
anonymity is seen as commercially essential.
The issues of privacy may reinforce the
role of the intermediary and enable them to
work as a "trusted" information broker.
The Service Culture
Which is moving faster – the digital
content revolution or the demands of the
customer?
Increasingly customer's expectations are
not driven by their best publishing experience
but by their best service experience anywhere.
In some publishing sectors they are beginning
to "pull" content down the supply chain.
New personalized models of information
acquisition and consumption are clearly on the
increase and can be expected to dominate over
the coming decade. Although readers may remain
reluctant to purchase information on a pay per
view basis, they are also becoming
increasingly dissatisfied with having to
purchase their information in bundles
predefined by the publisher – whether these
bundles are “books” or “journal
subscriptions”.
The new "service" culture means that
suppliers need to put themselves in the shoes
of the customer, understand their perspective
and recognize that "the customer may not
always be right but is still the customer."
Identifying CRM Components
The Database
If CRM is to present a consistent customer
interface, it is important that all customer
data is consolidated. This does not mean that
everyone will automatically have access to
everything nor be presented with much greater
detail than necessary.
To consolidate customer information, the
entities and relationships involved must be
mapped, incorporating any relevant commercial
or industry standards. Data sources – and
their validity, accuracy and timeliness—must
be understood. Once underpinned with this
fundamental architecture, it is possible to
consolidate data, identify the most
authoritative source, implement controlled
maintenance processes, and eliminate
duplication, re-keying, uncertainty and
inconsistency.
The data model and database need to be
specifically "publishing-centric"; a
generalist approach to customer data is sure
to prove ineffective and inefficient.
One academic publisher commented, "We need
to recognize that addresses are temporary and
roles [assigned to individuals] can be
temporary." Taking name and address data from
myriad diverse sources, cleaning it up,
putting it into a database and then tying it
up with historic transaction records does not
solve the problem -- it merely provides a
temporary fix, which will need to be repeated.
The lack of a standard address structure
significantly complicates the ability to
de-duplicate customers. This is further
compounded as lists in certain sectors are
frequently purchased and cannot be effectively
automatically imported and integrated.
Removing duplication and verifying data at
source must be the goal. As long as customer
data is not properly integrated duplication
will occur.
Several publishers we talked to extract
customer data from various systems, clean it
and deposit it into a database. But few feed
the clean data back into the source systems.
One commented, "It's a waste of time taking
clean data and putting it back into an
uncontrolled environment."
Unless all customer data environments
become controlled, the clean up and merge
operation will have to be continually
repeated.
Operational and Analytical Applications
"Operational" CRM means using customer data
to process transactions or accessing data in
order to perform a focused task centered on an
individual customer. This applies to processes
associated with customer contact such as sales
force automation, telesales, call center
management, sales campaign management and
mailings.
“Analytical” CRM means leveraging historic
customer information, collected from
operational applications, to gain an
understanding of trends and behavior which
provides a basis for the strengthening of
relationships with customers and ultimately
the generation of new revenue streams (or a
reduction in customer management costs).
Used together, publishers can create a
cycle that improves business tracking
activities, improves analysis of trends and
performance, seeks new ways of modeling
decisions and as a result modifies actions
such as changes to pricing or the launch of
promotional campaigns to restart the cycle.
Implementation and Approach
CRM is not a panacea
To gain advantage from a CRM
implementation, the entire organization must
embrace CRM as the way of doing business. The
real drivers of CRM are cultural, commercial
and strategic. Gerald Shields CTO of Lifeway
Christian Resources encapsulated this,
"Implementing CRM tools is like buying an
exercise bike. It doesn't make you fit,
[ it simply declares an intent and provides a
mechanism.]"
It is of at least equal importance to ask
the question: “What will be the added value of
this investment from the customer
perspective?” We have found that the benefit
is nearly always viewed from the investor's
perspective.
"Big bang" versus a phased approach
Any CRM strategy in publishing must take
into account the uniqueness of the industry
and the particular business. Few publishers
would be able to cost-justify the “big bang”
approach to CRM. However, there is much to be
said for taking a modular approach to CRM,
tackling priority tasks first. If properly
planned, CRM can be implemented in many small
steps.
One international academic publisher told
us they were looking at CRM as "a focused
evolution." Another US academic publisher said
that they had dismissed ERP vendors who
appeared to be "looking at the issue [of CRM]
as secondary to supporting their core." A US
information publisher commented that they had
looked hard at the CRM marketplace and believe
what many vendors offer today is "vaporware"
and are also "cynical of the maturity of the
CRM environment."
A Recommended Approach
The following steps are recommended to any
publisher moving forward with a CRM
initiative.
1. Gain corporate commitment.
2. Identify costs and benefits. Focus on the
areas that will create the most value for the
business.
3. Establish business processes and metrics.
All business initiatives must understand from
where they will start, the planned path and
how performance is to be measured
4. Close the marketing loop. Create processes
that improve the business by tracking
activities, analyzing trends and performance,
modeling options and as a result adjusting
actions.
5. Data authority and adequacy. Data is the
key corporate asset. While good data cannot
ensure good decisions; bad data can certainly
contribute to bad decisions.
Blinded by
the e-light?
The Bookseler, January 26, 2001
Martyn Daniels of VISTA suggests seven
e-principles for doing business in an
unpredictable future.
Imagine rabbits crossing the road. Suddenly
they hear an oncoming car and see the bright
lights. Uncertain what to do and too
frightened to move, they are transfixed.
We can all relate to the driver, but we now
have to relate to the rabbit as well. We are
caught in the glare of the e-light of the
e-revolutions that are bearing down on us at
an alarming rate. What is certain is that we
cannot expect this vehicle to brake and give
us time to move.
The developments taking place within
publishing today are significant. The big
players are getting larger and are changing
the economies of scale and scope; vertical
integration is blurring roles within the
supply chain; media convergence is introducing
new players and new threats; and globalization
is challenging many of the traditional
publishing "rules".
One has only to compare current coverage in
the trade press of "e" related matters to that
of earlier last year (not to mention 1999) to
see the e-impact and, importantly, the speed
and momentum of change. The Bookseller covers
digital and e-publishing subjects in a monthly
column and regularly runs features devoted to
this area. The book business press has
certainly switched on the e-lights and is
further fuelling the impact of e-business.
In many cases we are not dealing with a
future we can predict or control. Publishers
will find it difficult to adopt a wait-and-see
policy. If they do, they may not have the
competencies to compete and may well find
others sitting at their table and eating their
dinner.
A recent editorial in Wired pointed out that
technology is now outstripping Moore's Law,
which to date has accurately predicted the
exponential rise in computing processing
power. That change is happening should not be
doubted; and change costs money.
Publishers need to equip themselves to meet
the conflicting requirements of physical and
digital products, local and global markets,
consolidated and fragmented content, and of
physical inventory and print-on-demand.
However, we also have to remember that for
some time to come the traditional print
environment will be the main revenue generator
for many and will still require support and
investment. Publishers will therefore be
subject to continuing and further pressure on
margins.
They still have to drive down the cost of
supporting the physical product overhead with
declining revenues while, at the other end,
needing to invest heavily to make the
e-publishing transition in order to realize
the new potential revenues. They are now also
having to re-examine their market position on
a host of issues and ask themselves: What is
happening in the market? Where exactly are we?
Where do we want to go and in what time frame?
And, what are the associated investment
requirements, actions and risks?
We must stop thinking that e-business is
different. It is business. This seems a simple
statement, but in practice, means some radical
changes in the ways we have come to think of
e-business and its role in our organizations.
Every player in publishing is finding that
they must step back and re-evaluate how they
do business, the marketplace in which they do
business, the partners they do business with,
and their competitors. These are not IT or
logistics issues. They are corporate issues,
and demand strategic vision, corporate
consensus and corporate commitment and action.
Piecemeal approaches, solutions and technology
that do not seamlessly communicate are no
longer acceptable.
Below, I propose seven principles of
e-business that I believe publishers should
consider when formulating or reviewing their
corporate support strategy. They are not
comprehensive; neither are they mandatory.
They just make sense in this brave new world.
1. Focus on core competencies
2. Focus on integration, not replication
3. Focus on a standard interface
4. Focus on core relationships across the
value chain
5. Focus on different user/community
perspectives
6. Focus on everybody, not the few
7. Focus on Web access
1 Focus on core competencies Publishers
must recognize their core competencies and be
able to differentiate between the varying
requirements of Content, the product in
digital, physical or any combination of media;
Context, the bibliographic information that
describes the product; and Commerce, the
trading rules and processes, including
customer information. Just as within any
environment, all are essential within the
e-business world. Two out of three will not
do. All three are linked, regardless of
whether you are selling virtual or physical
product or servicing customers on the
Internet.
The key question for publishers to ask
themselves is where their core competency
lies. Where do they add value in the evolving
value chain and proposition? Some may believe
that they provide added value and competitive
advantage by managing all three, content,
context and commerce, themselves, and that
they have the competencies and skills to be
truly self-sufficient. But is this so in all
cases? For example, a publisher may develop
and publish content, but is it capable of
providing it in every format, every type of
e-book, digitally distributed, provided on
demand and effectively "never out of print"?
Or is it necessary to recognize the competency
of others and outsource some of those tasks?
Publishers should consider the multitude of
new players in the field of publishing who
deal with content and need to be evaluated,
understood and positioned. Many of these new
content aggregators and distributors will
fail, but what is certain is that a number
will succeed and will radically alter aspects
of publishing as we know them today.
Only a few years ago Amazon was dismissed
by many, but look at its position today. All
major trade publishers now have a clear vested
interest in Amazon's continued growth and
success. Failure of some of the publishing
industry's dotcoms could have a fatal impact
on some publishers.
What is the role of the wholesaler in
today's market? Many are clearly repositioning
themselves for tomorrow. They are embracing
digital distribution, providing total Web
fulfillment services to bookstores and drop
shipment; they might even be regarded by some
as distributors. We need now to ask ourselves
what will be the core competencies of
tomorrow's wholesalers and their position in
tomorrow's publishing marketplace.
2 Focus on integration, not replication
When it comes to online fulfillment publishers
have a clear choice: to replicate their
commercial systems online or to integrate
their e-business activity seamlessly with
their existing systems and existing
information. Unfortunately, many publishers
have learned the hard way. The complexity and
skills required to integrate e-business
activity with existing systems are quite
different from those required to design their
own Web pages. And as e-business often means
taking on dotcom partners, publishers cannot
always tell which will succeed and which can
be depended upon as business partners.
By keeping core functions, such as
fulfillment and customer and product
databases, centralized and by adopting an
integrated approach, publishers ensure that
they can adapt to changes in the market and
are able to interface with any new players.
This approach is simpler, cost efficient,
recognizes the core competencies of those
involved and is consistent with physical
fulfillment.
There are many people with whom we now have
to interface. We need to think about how we
interface. Integration not replication is the
answer. Many of those who adopt a replication
route will fail, not because their choice of
digital warehouse was wrong but because they
introduced the risks and costs of duplicating
business systems when this could have been
avoided.
3 Focus on a standard interface Many
believe that the ability to process a credit
card transition is all that is required today
and that business-to-business (B2B) and
business-to-consumer (B2C) operations are
completely separate. However, the demands of
servicing even the B2C markets will become
increasingly complex. Customers will be more
demanding and their needs will be driven not
by what publishers can provide but by the
publishers' total e-experience.
The desirability of a single solution, of
managing all customers, B2B and B2C, through a
standard interface is compelling. It offers
standardization, commercial flexibility,
development economics and effective customer
service.
4 Focus on core relationships across the
value chain It is important that all
information is viewed consistently by everyone
across the value chain and the publishing life
cycle.
As illustrated by initiatives such as ONIX
(International Online Information Exchange)
and the earlier BIC Basic, product information
does not just materialize when the product
hits the warehouse, neither does it stop
there. The demand for product information is
exploding. After all, if you cannot find it
you cannot value it and you cannot buy it.
Today all major chains, e-tailers and
wholesalers have book-in-hand processes.
Collectively this is a huge cost to them. Its
primary focus is to collect rich information
which is often not available any other way.
The problem is that this is too late in the
lifecycle. More than 60% of customer service
calls are still about basic information, "Is
it available? What's the price?" Inconsistent
and inaccurate information is costing this
industry millions and also losing sales.
The question is not so much who will
provide the information for the marketplace,
but how publishers will produce and provide
the information in a timely manner. To survive
in this new environment, all publishers now
need a rich product database, with full export
capability to other databases, services,
business partners and even customers, as much
as they need a customer database and
fulfillment system.
5 Focus on the different user/community
perspectives Traditionally we have built
different systems for different user groups
and even different networks. We all have close
relatives and friends with whom we share close
information (our Intranet); more distant
relatives and friends we see less frequently
and share less information with (our
Extranet); and, finally, relatives and people
we only see at births, marriages and deaths
and share little information with (our
Internet). Yet we have all three types within
the same user groups and their individual
closeness will vary over time, so publishers
must have the flexibility to adapt to these
changes in relationships.
In addition, we also have to recognize that
the difference between the information
required by one group of customers and that
required by another group may vary by as
little as 5%. There is often more commonality
than we think.
There are many community builders out
there. Some want to own their community,
others only wish to be service providers.
Publishers must ensure that these
intermediaries do not lock publishers out from
knowing who their customers are and how to
service their needs. Sharing information with
your customers, and understanding their
behavior, become critical business factors. If
publishers are not careful and give these
factors away in the belief that they are
growing the business, they could be giving
away their future.
6 Focus on servicing everybody, not the
just the few Although it is relatively easy
for large publishers to trade electronically
with large booksellers directly, this is often
restricted to base transactions and rarely
filters down to the 80% of customers that
account for 20% of value and volume, but at a
high cost of service. Here we see traditional
communications such as fax, phone and even
post being used.
And herein lies a problem: electronic data
interchange (EDI) works best for large
publishers to communicate with large
booksellers and wholesalers; it is complex and
costly to set up and does not deal with
customer service queries effectively. The
smaller market, representing that 20%, does
not have the means to set up EDI, leaving it
with no choice but to use the older
traditional methods, which add to the expense
of order processing. So doing business with
the smaller customers is costly for large
publishers.
Another issue that publishers must consider
when servicing everybody and not just the few
is that they now operate within a global
environment. Globalization, a definite result
of the reach of the Internet, presents
publishers with an opportunity to increase
their customer base worldwide, without the
traditionally high customer service costs
associated with international customers. The
global economy, comprising customers and
partners, demands around-the-clock access to
information and the ability to trade both
efficiently and effectively. Viable e-business
options exist today to meet the mandates of
global trading.
7 Focus on Web access In yesterday's
market, business users wanted an integrated
desktop from which they could access
information in a consistent manner. Today is
no different, except that this desktop should
no longer be restricted to the confines of the
local environment. Publishing has a global
marketplace and, more importantly, customers
want to see and have access to their world.
Users want "My Web", identification,
personalization and consistency from anywhere
at anytime. E-business is about providing
solutions to all parties inside and outside
the organization.
These seven principles are not fixed, they
are fluid and will evolve. They do not address
all the issues that all publishers will face
in the coming years. However, the technology
exists; the opportunities exist. What is now
required is a broad e-business vision,
corporate strategy and the business commitment
to make it happen.
We need to cross the road, recognize the
opportunities, actions and risks, and avoid
being caught in the glare of the e-light.
____________________________________
The above is an edited version of the
keynote speech by Martyn Daniels, VISTA
International's strategic development
director, at the International Distribution
and Supply Chain Specialists Forum at the
Frankfurt Book Fair, 2000.
© 2001 Bookseller Publications
12 Dyott Street London WC1A 1DF
Tea and biscuits and a cosy
chat?
Publishing News, 23rd April, 1999
Martyn Daniels assesses the changing role
of the rep in today’s increasingly
cost-conscious environment.
Yesterday’s trade field representative was
focused on “selling in”, getting the product
on the shelf, pre-selling the front fist and
promoting the brand and, of course, on
service. Sounds both logical and necessary in
a market where there are so many new titles
competing for the same space and where getting
that space and visibility can make all the
difference. However, we must recognise that we
should view these not as sales but loans. Some
are now recognising that "sell through" will
be more mutually rewarding to both trading
partners than the sell in approach, with its
potential for poor space allocation and high
return risk. Purchasers are buying
increasingly in binary, and that means one at
a time or none! Obviously, as with any supply
chain perspective, sell through will impact on
the initial order volumes of some titles and
demand improved "quick response" service for
replenishment. Sell through will impact on
trading relationships and will necessitate
greater sharing of information. It will call
into question the cost effectiveness and
performance of sales representatives in both
their traditional role and in the new
environment. Ideally, everyone is looking for
"sell out'.
It is instructive to look at the industry's
marketing focus. One would assume it would be
on the consumer, creating a demand and
awareness that will in turn fuel retail demand
and pull through sales However, we see that
the majority of effort, resources and
information are aimed squarely at the
retailer, the trading partner. The field sales
representative is one important aspect of this
"internal" marketing and sales environment.
The various sectors and supply channels
differ in how they are serviced, and in the
role that the sales representative performs.
Both the US and UK trade markets have
witnessed a significant reduction in field
sales forces in recent years, though this has
been less prevalent in the professional and
academic sectors, where large numbers of
customers need to be serviced and the
consolidation of the customer base has been
less marked. What is clear in the trade
environment is that the relationship between
sales representative and bookseller is moving
from the cosy chat over tea and biscuits on to
a far more time critical, cost conscious and
demanding basis. Often, this forces the
publisher to review the cost effectiveness of
the use of a rep within individual accounts.
Inevitably, this results in some cases in the
withdrawal of rep services.
The challenge
In these cost conscious times, it's easy to
see the field sales force effort being focused
on the larger chains and accounts where a
greater return in volume and value can be
achieved. Increasingly, the smaller accounts
are receiving less attention from publishers
and are serviced by the wholesaler or are
buying on their judgement and knowledge of
what is available. Large accounts such as book
chains tend to buy centrally and therefore
reduce the need for store visits. However,
this is not always the case and certainly not
across the total range of titles published.
Thus, even in the chain environment, the
individual book store could fail to "make the
grade" required for a visit from a sales
representative.
Overheads are ever increasing, for both
publisher and retailer. Every minute the
retailer spends with a representative they
have to balance against time spent selling and
servicing the customer. A store has to balance
buying time and effort against merchandising
and selling time, and the knowledge gained in
buying has to be used to sell. How many visits
can a bookseller effectively use? The dilemma
facing every publisher is the cost incurred by
each rep's store visit. Every penny of a
publisher's cost has to be balanced against
the revenue achieved.
Service over the phone
The US has witnessed the emergence of a new
breed of rep, the telesales representative. US
publishers such as Random House, which has a
telephone sales department of 24, is embracing
the concept. This route has an understandable
appeal to publishers in that it can generate
orders, maintain customer dialogue and, most
importantly, provide a cost effective service
for smaller accounts. If the face to face sale
could be achieved cost effectively there would
be no need to adopt approaches such as
telesales. The reality is that the
representative is just not cost effective in
many smaller accounts, especially in the US
where geography means further costs. However,
telesales doesn't always satisfy the need of
the bookseller to see and feel the quality or
presentation of the product.
Catch 22
While publishers view some independent book
stores as not being cost effective to be
serviced by a sales representative, the
question inevitably remains: would such
outlets generate more business if they did
receive attention? Telesales could be one
answer, but the telephone is very restrictive
in that both parties have to be there at the
same time and all you can exchange are words!
In order properly to service an account it
first must be profiled. What does it buy? What
doesn't it buy? What's the rate of return, the
mix of front and back fist? And how do
publishers profile stores? If it is by sales
performance history, does this tell them what
wasn't bought and why, or just what was sold?
If tides are bought via a wholesaler does the
publisher even know? Do the retailers input or
verify their profiles, and if not is there a
gap between what the publisher believes is
needed and what the retailer actually needs?
All too readily, we assume we know the needs
of others but we don't often verify our
assumptions and, as a result, never understand
the gap, between what is provided and what is
required.
If the primary role of the representative
is to service the account, supplying
information that is relevant to the store's
buying decisions and which enables them to
sell, how can this be improved? Surely, the
representative is the ideal conduit?
The laptop system
Many publishers have developed a laptop
representative system. Some of these have been
successful but many have failed to live up to
expectations. The answer to the question "does
the representative take the system into the
store?" varies according to whom you talk to.
True, the professional sector has little
problem taking the technology to the customer
but trade publishers appear to. For a whole
lot of reasons the system is used the night
before and in the car between visits. In some
cases, it is no more than a glorified email
system. So how do we resolve this issue, or
more importantly provide bookshops with the
information they need?
Yesterday's representative PCs often failed
in that they tried to replicate the rep's car
boot or suitcase and thereby attempted to put
everything on the system. This made them
expensive, complex and unfriendly. A major US
legal publisher is embarking on developing the
next generation of rep system to service not
one but a number of divisions. The problems
they face are timeliness and accuracy of
information. and the logistical difficulties
of accommodating increasingly complex
downloads of data top individual systems.
The questions remain: So what? What's new?
How can we do things differently? What options
do we have? The representative is an
increasingly expensive option. Telesales work
sometimes, but not at all with visual product.
How do publishers provide the best service to
each and every account? If ignored,
booksellers will be driven to rely even
further on wholesalers or other
intermediaries.
A fresh approach
Today, publishers are investing heavily in
producing marketing websites. They often fail
as consumer sites, for the consumer doesn't
know they exist and if he did, he would
probably want an aggregated one-stop service
such as Amazon. However, these are often rich
sites filled with jackets, blurbs, author
notes, reviews, first chapters and the like.
In fact, only cost and effort restricts the
information that can be posted and, in
reality, everything produced to support a
title or an author can be made available. All
publishers gather masses of information that
supports the title through its development and
it can be reused to support its sale. Rather
than provide a token website, the publisher
should be collating this information and
making it available for free over the Web. It
is clear that the bibliographic service agents
are desperately trying to enrich their product
but are often limited both by what's available
to them and the CD Rom technology that still
prevails. In the US, book stores have been
logging on to Amazon and Barnes & Noble to get
better product information for free, and new
bibliographic aggregators such as MUZE are now
setting new standards.
The Internet can provide a common solution
to the many and various issues raised. If we
look at services such BookEasyTM we see a
service designed to give bookshops common
access and navigation to perform inquiries and
place orders. The service is now starting to
be linked to publishers' marketing websites to
provide enriched information. What we are
seeing is a store looking at publishers'
information from their own perspective. It is
not difficult to see this same information
being presented slightly differently to
accommodate the representatives' perspective.
The information doesn't change, just the
perspective. In order to satisfy the
representatives' and booksellers' needs,
additional new information and functions will
be required. But it's not rocket science!
Some bookshops could get an electronic, 'my
representative" service. The stores would even
profile themselves and ensure that they can be
proactively made aware of any relevant new
information. Today a number of publishers
regularly fax stores with what some would
regard junk mail. Surely, it would be more
productive to target those booksellers that
want information with the information they
want, when they want it and in a standard
format that can be easily reviewed and acted
upon.
Publishers must recognise that a good
representative is a good representative. All
the systems and information available can't
replace their enthusiasm and transform a bad
representative. Information that is targeted
and delivered proactively can make a
difference, but information that is sprayed
across the market may be inneffective and
uneconomic.
And don't forget, all representatives,
telesales and customer service staff go home
at five. On the Internet, the publisher's
information and service stays out all night
and can be accessed at any time from anywhere.
Tea and biscuits no longer required!
Hey! They've Found a Way to Herd Cats
Daily Telegragh, 18th December, 1998

Trading in,
trading up
The Bookseller,
1998
As the trade wide initiative on the supply
chain delivers its initial findings, Martyn
Daniels of Vista challenges the trade to think
outside the box and not just to settle for
quick wins
For the players in an entire industry
sector to decide to stop competing and begin
cooperating even in a limited sphere of
activity requires unusual preconditions. There
may be an overwhelming business case that
works to everyone's advantage, or it may be
that the entire sector is under a structural
threat whereby individual companies recognise
that they must co operate to survive.
Many commentators argue that both these
preconditions can now be found in the UK book
trade. The amount of stock held across the
trade, for example, far exceeds unit sales for
many titles, there are appallingly low levels
of stock turn, and there is a questionable
return on investment. Indeed, the current
Publishers Association/ Booksellers
Association supply chain initiative is aimed
at addressing these issues, and it is hard to
imagine that it would have been established in
the absence of both opportunity and need.
However, these circumstances are not
peculiar to the UK market; they are
international. The symptoms and even some of
the causes may be different but, in an
increasingly global market, the potential
consequences are universal.
What are these symptoms, what are the
causes and, above all, which are the real
issues that need to be addressed?
If the supply chain were a car, some people
in the trade would argue that it would only be
necessary to change the tyres, since the
vehicle itself is still mechanically sound.
Others would say that a new engine is required
but that the bodywork is good for another
100,000 miles or more. However, 1 am convinced
that as the 21st century approaches, the road
ahead is going to be radically different from
the one in use today and that a radically
different mode of transport will be needed.
Quick wins versus the long term
Those who approach the supply chain from a
logistics perspective highlight excess
physical stock movement, double handling and
duplication of effort. The only player to gain
from these inefficiencies is the carrier. The
argument suggests that the problems can be
solved by addressing these "physical' issues.
This perspective is predictable in its
viewpoint and in its solutions. Although such
solutions may provide some quick wins, they
tend to be short term, parochial and aimed at
treating the symptoms, not the causes.
Others seek a more sophisticated
explanation. They contend that the problem
lies in the "broken information chain". This
is where a lack of co operation between
trading partners results, for example, in the
players at one end not knowing what is
selling, and the players at the other not
knowing what is available. Until this problem
is properly addressed, it is argued, the
situation will not improve. This approach
offers much greater opportunities.
However, the achievement of lasting
benefits requires real co operation, trust and
a willingness to recognise the value others
bring to the chain.
In the search for answers, it might be
tempting to look to other commercial sectors
for solutions. Such proposals are focused
primarily on improving inventory management
across the chain: quick response, just in
time, vendor managed inventory, push
distribution and so on. These have all worked
in other commercial environments, and all have
proved capable of creating opportunities to
improve profitability under appropriate
conditions. However, such solutions appear to
work best in a consolidated market where a
dominant play exists that can take control of
a situation and create opportunities.
Where the outcome of any such proposals is
perhaps less certain is in a many to many
supply chain, in which the players may have
hundreds or even thousands of customers or
suppliers. In the book trade, the challenge is
further compounded by the tens of thousands of
new products launched every year. Each one has
an enormous unpredictability in terms of
sales, resulting in substantial volatility in
demand down the line.
Supply chain gurus from other commercial
sectors would find the challenges of the book
trade colossal in comparison to their own.
Beware the simple transplant
There are those in the UK book trade who
look enviously at other book markets and
advocate the adoption of their supply models.
Consolidated operations such as Centraal
Boekliuis in the Netherlands are often cited
as demonstrating best practice. However, it is
easy to overlook the fact that models of this
kind often do not travel well. Cultural
differences, market forces and industry
structure are areas of difference that should
not be ignored in any analysis.
There are some signs of growth in the UK
market, but is this real growth or merely an
increase in demand from retailers, fuelled by
the latest retail "space wars" and the
resultant new store openings? It is easy for
publishers to believe that orders from
retailers represent consumer demand, only to
find that their books are merely wallpapering
a new book superstore. This is one example of
how lack of information and poor communication
in the trade leads to inefficiencies.
Rather than attempt partial solutions, it
is essential to look at the overall supply
process and information chain in the trade.
The view should not be from warehouse to
consumer, nor even from printer to consumer,
but from author to reader. This "life cycle"
perspective looks at some of the real causes
of the supply chain problems, and offers an
understanding of where some of the biggest
opportunities and benefits may lie.
However, it is questionable whether a life
cycle perspective can be adopted in an
environment that still refers to publishers as
having a "front" office (all the pre
production processes that go into the
development of a book) and a "back" office
(everything post production such as
warehousing, distribution and fulfilment).
Decisions that are made in the front office
can be conveniently forgotten after
publication. Their consequences, such as a log
jam of unwanted copies in the warehouse, are
blamed on the more visible "physical" problems
in the supply chain rather than on the over
enthusiastic initial print order.
If this life cycle perspective were to be
adopted, how would the trade move forward to
make the necessary changes that would obviate
what looks certain to be a long, slow and
painful squeeze on everyone's bottom line? How
is it possible to distinguish those activities
that can benefit from collaboration across the
chain from those that produce the greatest
benefits when left to competitive forces? How
is it possible to create a "win win"
environment that will improve profitability
for all in the short term, while positioning
and arming the market for the changes that lie
ahead?
First, the surplus volume of stock that
clogs up the supply chain has to be removed,
as it adds no value, only expense. To achieve
this goal it is necessary to establish a well
informed process for making decisions on both
pricing and manufacturing. This needs to focus
on minimising risk, providing an ability to
respond quickly to demand and reducing the
temptation to push stock blindly into the
pipeline.
Secondly, it must be recognised that the
economy is increasingly global: geography is
disappearing. About 40% of our product is
exported, and that means 40% of the challenge
involves issues outside the UK.
The efficiency and effectiveness of US
retailers and wholesalers impacts directly on
the UK market as never before. It remains to
be seen how many of these companies establish
a physical presence in the UK, but the
economies of scale and scope they achieve in
their domestic market are clear.
In addition, there is also the Internet,
which does not respect territorial pricing,
rights or distribution. If the UK marketplace
is looked at in isolation by the trade it will
be at great risk to its future. Dialogue must
be opened with potential entrants to the UK
market, and they must be seen as part of an
overall long term solution, not as a threat.
Thirdly, it needs to be recognised that
there are differences between the supply
chains of different market sectors within the
book trade, such as general and academic, and
differences within these sectors themselves.
The 80:20 rule
It is a generally accepted principle that
20% of trading partners generate 80% of value
and volume; conversely, 80% of trading
partners generate only 20% of value and
volume, alongside disproportionate
administration and service costs.
The profile of the top 20% shows that there
is high volume across a relatively narrow
range of product, consolidated shipment, a
high risk of returns, considerable price
sensitivity, complex commercial demands and at
a unit sale level, at least low margin.
Profitability is dependent on economics of
scale. Looking at the other 80% of trading
partners, there is a marked difference: low
volumes across a wide range of titles, low
volume shipments, high variability in demand,
low risk of returns, simple transactions and,
at unit sale level, high margin. Profitability
is dependent on minimising administrative
costs.
These two groups cannot be managed in the
same way. They have different service
requirements and commercial profiles. The top
20% require an emphasis on supply chain
efficiency, while the 80% require an emphasis
on administration and service efficiency
However, both require an open exchange of
trading information across the supply chain
about, for example, availability of stock or
sales levels.
Fourthly, before existing problems can be
tackled, it is necessary to understand complex
supply chain processes and to share that
understanding between trading partners.
This means sharing information and even,
where appropriate, risk. How long have
booksellers tried to do business with one arm
tied behind their backs, not knowing whether
stock will be available to fulfil reorders? In
some cases they have not been able to find an
accurate price for a title. How long have
publishers regarded order demand from their
customers as representative of sales demand?
How long can publishers afford to be ignorant
of true sales levels for a given title and of
demand and stock movements across the chain?
The information flow
The electronic exchange of information does
not solve problems such as these, although it
does assist in delivering information more
accurately. Equally, sales data, such as those
provided by BookTrack, do not provide an
answer by themselves, but they do at least
start to offer a hitherto elusive sales
perspective. Price and availability
information can be exchanged easily today, but
few have invested in the systems that can make
this happen.
Sales and service opportunities that are
afforded by direct, interactive, open access
to online information must also be considered.
The Internet offers the potential for
customers to access information for
themselves, 24 hours a day. Home banking is
just one example of this self service
environment; account details can be had
without the need of an intermediary.
The Internet is establishing itself as a
significant force for conducting electronic
commerce more economically. It enables even
the smallest of trading partners to "serve
themselves" and communicate more effectively.
It also enables the physically and
geographically small to be virtually and
globally big. It is the great leveller.
Fifthly, some difficult decisions on
partners need to be taken, particularly
concerning roles and responsibilities across
the life cycle as a whole. There are those who
advocate the disintermediation of others in
the supply chain. Distributors, for example,
are known to feel that wholesalers are surplus
to requirements. They argue that further
consolidation would remove duplication and
offer economies of both scale and scope.
Is such a quick win possible? Does it stem
from a biased or blinkered perspective on the
value added activities in the supply chain? Is
it failing to look forward to the potential
challenges, threats and opportunities that
will make up the book trade of tomorrow?
What of the role and value associated with
a wholesaler? The publisher may see the
wholesaler as just another customer, while a
distributor may see it as a direct competitor.
A large chain retailer may see it as a
potential supplier, and a small independent as
a critical one stop shop for all its immediate
needs. The UK wholesaler market has seen
considerable consolidation but what about new
entrants such as Ingrams or Baker & Taylor
from the US? Could they reshape the market in
the near future? Is the consolidation role of
the wholesaler pivotal to independent
booksellers or merely an added layer of
duplication?
What role do distributors play? Large
publishers may see them as unnecessary players
and believe that they can do the job better
themselves. Other publishers may view them as
critical consolidators, offering economies of
scale and scope in customer service as well as
physical distribution. Wholesalers will see
them as direct competitors, large chain
retailers as important trading partners, and
small independents as irrelevant.
Consolidation in the supply chain, such as
reducing the number of distributors, could
reduce short term costs, while the growth of
retail space by the largest bookselling chains
could increase sales. However, in the longer
term such consolidation may increase
publishers' exposure and risk as their
business is placed in the hands of fewer and
fewer commercial partners.
A common understanding of the value added
by all the intermediaries within the chain
must be sought.
At the beginning of the 21st century it
would be dangerous to fall into the trap of
"correcting" supply chain processes today
based on perceptions of yesterday.
When we think of supply chains we
inevitably think of things such as warehouses,
trucks and parcels. We think of physical
geography: the US, UK, Europe. This is
changing: we are at the threshold of the
"virtual" world. The physical boundaries that
constrained our thinking have gone.
We have to consider electronic content and
electronic delivery. We have to consider
distributed physical printing of electronic
content on demand not just at the printer or
at the warehouse but also in the bookshop or
maybe even in the home.
Getting smarter
Last year Ingrams launched its Lightning
Print "one book at a time" service in the US,
and in doing so took one small step down the
virtual road. The service has a digital
library and prints on demand for the retailer
copies of books that may otherwise be out of
print. The service aims to extend the life of
books while at the same time removing
inventory, handling and print set up costs.
Ingrams also recently launched its "Green
Light" drop shipment service, which offers
delivery not just to bookstores but also to
customers' homes.
Bringing such new thinking to traditional
problems offers previously unimagined
opportunities to change the processes and
relationships to make the supply chain
smarter, more responsive and, as a result,
more profitable for all.
If solutions to the supply chain are found
that are based only on perceptions of the book
trade today, opportunities will be missed. And
it is these opportunities that will be
exploited by others.
Martyn Daniels is director of strategic
development at Vista Computer Services, and
has supply chain management, business systems
and retail experience gained from working in
other commercial sectors.
Book Publishing, a difficult trade to EDIfy
Electronic Trader, July / August
1994
The Supply Chain is complex, covering what
can be viewed as several discreet markets:
trade, library/academic and international,
with often more than one intermediary handling
the product between the distributor and the
consumer. In addition it can be affected by: •
The high number of publishers, (over 4,000 in
the UK alone) and their ownership and control
of the distribution of their individual
titles. • The high number of small retailers
and library outlets, (over 2,000 UK
retailers). • The high volume and diversity of
books available for order, (2 million
available books). • The volume of new products
and increasing width and depth of subject
range, (60,000 new titles a year). • The usage
and potential erosion of the Net Book
Agreement to control retail price. The
widespread practice of "Sale or Return". •
Forty per cent of the industry in the UK is
international.
We believe that the industry has many areas
of opportunity for EDI within its Supply
Chain, to overcome some of the industry's
complexities, and its current rather archaic
practices.
Availability of Product
The availability of individual titles to
meet an individual order is not known at the
time of its placement. The title may be low in
stock, out of stock and scheduled for reprint
or out of stock with no commitment to reprint.
The sender of the order is unaware of these
facts until he either receives an
acknowledgement report or delivery note. This
can also result in lost sales.
Accuracy of Delivery Invoice Information
Most publishers have adopted a pre-invoice
process where the Delivery Note and Invoice
are produced with the Pick document before
picking. Any “scratches" on the pick process
are not therefore reflected on either the
Delivery Note or the Invoice. However, whilst
the quantity delivered remains a variable, the
electronic trading benefits of automating pre
staging receipt and invoice reconciliation
cannot be fully realised.
Returns A significant percentage of
product, which can be as high as 20% for
paperbacks, is returned through the Supply
Chain unsold. In addition , the percentage of
product not ordered and held as excess stock
at the Distributor is not known. Although the
returns process provides the publisher with
product visibility in the marketplace, it does
introduce significant cost into the chain in
terms of excess; stock, space, handling,
carriage, financial reconciliation and
administration.
The majority of product is returned to the
publisher. This is due to the Net Book
Agreement (the price maintenance mechanism
which has operated in the UK for many years),
the calculation of royalty and the need for
the Publisher to ensure that the credit given
equals the price paid, which may have changed
since purchase.
Lack of Sales and Stock Information The
Publisher is aware of stock movements out of
his distribution centre, but unaware of actual
stock sold and stock held within the chain.
Through use of sales representatives he can
establish a feel of the rate of sale and by
tight control on returns, make a judgement on
the status of the product within its life
cycle.
However, the increased presence of the
wholesalers and their high service levels has
introduced a further step within the chain and
as a result raised the risk of judgement error
by the Publisher on stock transfers, holding
and reprints.
Payment A number of factors make the
payment process complex; orders being split
into multiple deliveries and invoices, the
volume of claims raised against the pre
invoice and returns processes, the potential
number of accounts and the special deals
struck by the sales representatives. As a
result the sector tends to reconcile invoices
and credits and pay against monthly statement.
Debit Note claims are raised at the same time
as a return request. In reconciling the
statement, the retailer will deduct any debits
claimed irrespective of whether a credit has
been received and pay on the net value. This
obviously makes payment reconciliation more
difficult.
Orders Due Retailers are increasingly
requesting that non availabie order lines are
not placed on an Orders Due file. They choose
instead to repeat the order as a chaser.
The immediacy and accuracy of EDI would
give all parts of the book publishing supply
chain the management data to solve these
problems, and put management back in control.
The industry has yet to develop such
solutions.
Martyn Daniels is an Independent
Consultant, currently on assignment to First
Edition, studying the book industry’s supply
chain. He was previously Systems Manager of
B&Q, where he drove the company to be one of
the most sophisticated users in the UK. He was
also Chairman of the Tradanet User Group, the
largest user group in Europe.
|